A love letter to classic Game Boy Color RPGs, TEARSCAPE is a title that should be right up my alley. The Game Boy Color was my primary console growing up, sparking a lifelong passion for handheld gaming and filling me with fond memories of its library. Because TEARSCAPE captures that exact same spirit, I was fully prepared to fall head over heels for it.
The pixel art is exceptionally well-crafted—if you told me this was natively developed for the Game Boy Color, I would have believed you. Environments feel visually distinct, and enemy sprites pop off the background for great readability. The sound design is unobtrusive; while it isn't a soundtrack I'd listen to on its own, it is completely serviceable during gameplay. Everything about the presentation screams Game Boy Color.
However, as much as I wanted to adore it, and despite its genuine strengths, the overall experience ultimately left me wanting.
The Core Gameplay
Anyone who has ever played a 2D The Legend of Zelda game—especially handheld classics like The Minish Cap or the Oracle series—will know what to expect here.
The game takes place from a top-down perspective and sees the player exploring a series of interconnected single-screen maps. Along the way, you find abilities that not only help during general gameplay but also grant access to previously locked areas, with enemies naturally scaling up in difficulty as you progress further into the game. It is a very familiar setup; however, TEARSCAPE expands on this basic formula by offering a variety of weapons with distinct attack power, range, and speed—rather than the single sword usually seen in these types of games. You can map these weapons directly to three dedicated action slots while managing secondary power-ups assigned to a single button that you cycle through.
Exploration builds on this foundation: chests contain maps that reveal distinct sectors, among other things, hidden treasures and extra challenges reward curiosity, and occasional side quests appear through scattered NPCs. However, the core mechanics that set TEARSCAPE apart from traditional handheld classics are its RPG progression and Souls-like elements. Defeating enemies awards Experience Points that you freely allocate to character stats upon leveling up. To spend those points, you must reach one of the designated rest points. These shrines serve as your central hub to save, level up, equip up to three stat-boosting charms, and restore health or power-up charges—at the cost of respawning all defeated enemies. True to the Souls genre, dying leaves your unspent Experience Points at the site of your demise, forcing a risky recovery run before they are lost forever.
TEARSCAPE's Shortcomings
The foundation is built on tried-and-tested systems, which is by no
means a negative. Plenty of titles succeed by cleverly blending such
established ideas. Where TEARSCAPE stumbles, however, is in its narrative execution and worldbuilding, map layout, and combat balance.
The Story and World
What is the story of TEARSCAPE? I honestly don't know. It definitely exists and seems heavily implied, but that's about it. Taking inspiration from games such as Dark Souls and Hollow Knight, TEARSCAPE hints at its lore throughout the world. Unlike its influences, however, it fails to convey what it is trying to tell, leaving me confused rather than eager to uncover more.
In Hollow Knight, every element contributes to a cohesive narrative whole, offering glimpses into the collapse of its kingdom. Every enemy feels like a natural inhabitant of that dying world. In contrast, TEARSCAPE breaks its dark atmosphere with jarring fetch quests like carrying a pig or returning a lost cat to an NPC.
The overall roster of foes feels less like an organic part of a larger ecosystem and more like checking off classic tropes: a standard skeleton, a fire-casting magician, an armored knight, and so on. While the dialogue attempts to weave a mysterious tale, the world itself fails to reflect that narrative, leaving little motivation to dig deeper.
My second gripe lies with the environmental design. While functional for most of the runtime, several maps force unavoidable damage. Although you unlock a shield to block incoming threats, certain rooms feature aggressive traps like rapid arrow launchers or falling rocks along auto-moving platform rides which make the shield redundant.
I experienced several moments where arrows shot simultaneously from opposite walls at offset intervals, forcing me to absorb a hit because the shield could only guard one direction at a time. The platforming segments present similar issues: falling rocks bounce off the tracks upon impact, inflicting mandatory damage if your railcar happens to pass beneath them at the wrong second.
My final gripe with the world design is the fact that once you unlock certain power ups that unlock a part of the world, the blocks do respawn along with defeated enemies; I see no reason why that should be the case, as all it serves after the player has already unlocked these areas is to slow the player down, and leave them confused as to whether or not they have already gone through said blockage before.
In short, the world-building and layout of TEARSCAPE, while pretty, ends up feeling confused and non-cohesive, rather than a complement to its narrative and themes. While offering some decent ideas taking from classic GameBoy RPGs, it unfortunately fumbles the execution.
The Combat
Early encounters start strong, presenting clear attack patterns, fair telegraphs, and satisfying counter-based play once mastered; however, later enemies simply become a chore to fight. Several late-game foes occupy massive portions of the screen, sweep wide areas, and feature virtually no telegraphed windups prior to striking. These late-game enemies deal massive damage, making standard combat encounters feel unrewarding. Because the game frequently issues combat against multiple high-tier threats in tight spaces, fighting them quickly loses its appeal. By the final chapter, I completely abandoned combat and simply sprinted past every non-mandatory encounter because they felt like a waste of time.
This frustration sadly extends to specific boss encounters as well. One boss, once again occupying a massive portion of the arena, repeatedly bounces toward you on a pogo stick, shattering the floor on contact. While bouncing, he moves rapidly across the room, and touching even the topmost pixels of his sprite—such as his shoulders—triggers full collision damage. This forces you to concurrently track broken floor tiles, dodge rapid movement, and contend with misleading depth perception that falsely suggests you are standing safely above his hitbox when you are actually touching it.
I will give the game credit, though, for some honestly interesting boss design. While I do have some complaints about some of them, they were interesting to learn and quite fun to overcome—at least when their attacks didn't feel cheap like the previously mentioned pogo attack.
In conclusion, while the combat is, for the most part, serviceable, it unfortunately ends up devolves into being more of a chore than anything else, by the end. The rewards never truly felt justified, and so long as you're high enough level to defeat the bosses, there is no real reason to actually fight the normal enemies. It wouldn't have been that bad if the enemy design didn't turn completely ridiculous by the later parts of the game, but by that point, the juice was honestly just not worth the squeeze anymore.
Should you play it?
TEARSCAPE incorporates a lot of great mechanics gathered from different genres, mainly old Game Boy Color RPGs and modern Souls-likes. Somewhere along the way, however, it fumbles the execution. That said, it isn't a long game—taking me about 8 hours to beat—and I can't say I regret playing it.
It serves as a decent time-killer if you want a nostalgic throwback to old-school handheld RPGs, have already played through the classics, and are searching for something new. Just be prepared for some rough patches along the way.
VERDICT: Maybe
Reviewed on PC
Available On: PC
Post a Comment